Did you know?

Did You Know?

It is not possible to be allergic to sugar...

Find out more facts like this

Science & ResearchPrint this page

Fructose and non-fructose sugar intakes in the US population and their associations with indicators of metabolic syndrome

Sun et al., (2011) Food Chem Toxicol 49:2875-2882

Objective: To estimate dietary fructose and non-fructose intakes of individuals and relate intake to biological measurements, including indicators for METs

Design: Cross-sectional

Setting: US

Participants: NHANES 1999 – 2006. Sugars intakes were estimated in participants aged 12 – 80 y, with the relationship to bio-measurements undertaken only in adults aged 19 – 80 y

Main outcome measures: Participants were categorised by their percentile %energy intake of fructose and non-fructose sugar, and these were plotted against their bio-measurements. Fructose and non-fructose sugars were estimated using the Food Commodity Intake Databases (FCID) and the USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference

Results: For teenagers, mean %energy from sugars was: total sugars 28%, added sugars 21%, fructose 10% and non-fructose 18%. For adults, mean %energy from sugars was: total sugars 23%, added sugars 16%, fructose 9%, non-fructose 15%. Significant trends were seen with increasing sugar intakes and decreasing HDLc, BP, HbA1c, WC and uric acid. There was no significant trend between serum TG and sugar intakes.

Conclusions: Fructose and non-fructose sugar consumptions were not positively associated with indicators of METs.

Back to recent research list

SUGAR PRODUCTION FIGURES WORLDWIDE

World Map
redbluegreenvoiletorangeyellow

EATING FOR HEALTH

Pasta shapes small homepage image

Eating a healthy, balanced diet along with taking regular exercise is key to physical and mental wellbeing.

No foods should be considered as ‘good or bad’ as all foods play an important role in the diet. It is only when foods are eaten in excess that health problems result.

Read more about eating healthy